Wednesday, July 30th, 2014
Earlier this year, writer Robinson Meyer spent some time wearing face paint known as “CV dazzle” in public, in an effort to conceal himself from the current surveillance state. While the effect it had on technology is difficult to track, Meyer did learn a great deal about its effect on humans, and his interactions with them.
Five Mannequins…or Possibly Six?
Near the end of the article, Meyer says:
Because here is the essence of CV dazzle’s strangeness: The very thing that makes you invisible to computers makes you glaringly obvious to other humans.
It’s clear that this is not a real solution to prevent tracking. However, as a performance piece and a commentary, it’s very interesting.
Tuesday, July 15th, 2014
Despite the fact that it includes another bastardization of the meaning of “Sophie’s Choice”, the rest of this piece on lost video game levels and game design is a fun ride. Heidi Kemps was able to track down the roots of a mysterious Sonic the Hedgehog cartridge which contained levels that never saw the light of day, before ultimately returning a copy to its creator.
Tuesday, May 6th, 2014
Though their reasons differ, both Conor Friedersdorf and Sonny Bunch want to see America bring back execution via the guillotine. I favor the outright abolition of the death penalty, and long time readers will know I’m an outspoken supporter of The Innocence Project. I think Friedersdorf’s plan just might get us there.
Update (May 6th, 2014): The second episode of John Oliver’s new show “Last Week Tonight” featured a fantastic summary of the death penalty.
Tuesday, March 25th, 2014
It’s likely you will learn at least two things from this article on blood and horseshoe crabs. First, horseshoe crab blood is harvested in massive quantities for use in medical tests. And second, that blood is blue.
Tuesday, December 10th, 2013
Though the Winter solstice isn’t for another 11 days, many of us in the Northern Hemisphere have already experienced our earliest sunset of the year. How can that be? The Atlantic explains, with science.
Thursday, November 28th, 2013
The Atlantic is doing fine work this Thanksgiving.
Wednesday, July 10th, 2013
Rottin’ in Denmark has an interesting look at where some tattered American currency winds up: Zimbabwe. I was unable to find more information on this, but I did stumble upon this post detailing how the US generally disposes of worn-out currency.
Wednesday, April 24th, 2013
A satellite image looked like two people looking over a bloody scene, and the Internet was all over it.
Speaking of the poor efficacy of crowdsourcing, The Atlantic covers the anatomy of a misinformation disaster from last week’s hunt for the Boston Marathon bombers, while the Washington Post has in-depth coverage of exactly how expert analysis is carried out.
Wednesday, April 17th, 2013
The always-reasonable Bruce Schneier’s piece following the Boston Marathon Bombing is well-worth a read.
Don’t glorify the terrorists and their actions by calling this part of a “war on terror”. Wars involve two legitimate sides. There’s only one legitimate side here; those on the other are criminals. They should be found, arrested, and punished. But we need to be vigilant not to weaken the very freedoms and liberties that make this country great, meanwhile, just because we’re scared.
Empathize, but refuse to be terrorized. Instead, be indomitable — and support leaders who are as well. That’s how to defeat terrorists.
Keep calm and carry on.
Wednesday, January 16th, 2013
The Atlantic is a generally well-respected news magazine, with a popular website to which this very site often links. On Monday, however, TheAtlantic.com published “sponsor content” which very clearly ran afoul of journalistic ethics. Specifically, the website featured a post extolling the many great accomplishments of Scientology in 2012, a screenshot of which can be seen below1:
How fake does that background look?
Readers around the world were taken aback by this page, in no small part due to Scientology’s extremely checkered history, particularly when it comes to the Internet. The content of the “post” was little more then a press release for Scientology wrapped up in the guise of an Atlantic article, and the indication of “Sponsor Content” was far from large. Far worse than the text of the post itself, however, was the comments section. Though they had an identical appearance to the comments seen on all other (non-sponsor) pages on TheAtlantic.com, these comments were heavily moderated, with only pro-Scientology comments being allowed. Simply put, the entire thing was an affront to everything for which journalism stands.
One can only hope that this does not represent a new trend in otherwise-quality sources of journalism. Thankfully, writer and editor Erin Kissane has done yeoman’s work in spelling out just why this whole thing is so deeply troubling. Her entire post is well worth reading, but here she is on the aforementioned comments:
But this all pales in comparison to the simple betrayal of the reader’s trust. When you fail to explicitly state that you’re blocking and deleting comments critical of your subject and your publication, you imply that you aren’t—especially when every other comments section on your website allows negative comments. You are presenting a tiny selection of comments by supporters of your client as the entire conversation. You are telling a lie
Of course, with a simple spoof, The Onion has nailed it as usual.